
Lorne Groe, a blogger who writes about things interesting to me, recently shared his thoughts on the scale (in revenues) required to effectively go public (in response to a query from me).
He says, in summary, that on average tech companies have trailing revenues of $82.6 million with year-over-year growth rates of 39.3% prior to going public. This is a great bit of information, for which I thank Lorne.
He added the following:
Here is what's interesting to me - based on my quick analysis of the current valuation multiples for the class of 2005, only 60% are trading above were they would have likely been sold.Here is what's interesting to me - based on my quick analysis of the current valuation multiples for the class of 2005, only 60% are trading above were they would have likely been sold. So the question I have is why risk it?
I couldn't agree more. The cost of being public is so high that it is almost impossible to do an apples to apples comparison. If a company weren't public, how much higher would its profits be? Would revenues and margins benefit from the shield preserved by private companies?
I believe that savvy entrepreneurs and investors have largely changed their thinking about the optimal exit--no longer an IPO. Instead, they're looking for the optimal M&A exit.
There are, I suppose, times when a company should seek to go public, but I wonder if it is optimal even at the level where the market executes today.
Lorne suggested in his post that I research IPO data for non-tech companies. I'll do it. Watch for it!








ispat which is the best sell, hold, or buy.
Posted by: mukesh panchal | November 29, 2007 4:15 AM | Permalink to Comment