Yesterday, I prepared the post regarding Firepoll using YouTube, which I have used in the post for including videos in my blogs. Just before I posted the final version, I read on Fred Wilson's blog his post about his son's band, including a video clip he'd posted using Vimeo.
I was previously unaware of Vimeo. The service is comparable in many ways to YouTube. I noted that the enrollment and uploading process was as easy as YouTube with an advantage or two. For instance, the video can be viewed on Vimeo immediately in its original format during the flash conversion period. On YouTube, it can take hours for a video to be viewable as it is converted. I also like the flah player on Vimeo better than the one on YouTube.
On the other hand, after I pasted the HTML code into my blog post for the viewer, I could not get it to work. While I suspect there was user error involved, I've never had this problem with YouTube it works. Ultimately, I had to post the video to YouTube and use the YouTube flash player for the Firepoll video to make it work.
Tell me about your experiences with YouTube end Vimeo. I imagine lots of people are experimenting with these (and other) options to make the same decision.
Which of these two viewers works best for you?
Will Allred, Firepoll CEO on Vimeo
.jpg)
Hi Devin,
The Vimeo clip isn't playing because crucial information is missing from the embed code. Did you alter your embed code after copying it from Vimeo?
Please reply by email so I can continue to help you directly. Thank you.
Jakob
Posted by: Jakob Lodwick | April 26, 2006 5:50 AM | Permalink to Comment